Hot, Hot, and More Hot

It’s been over two years since we began publishing this blog. This was our very first post back in June 2008. Now that the summer is here it’s seems relevant.

When it gets this hot it’s tempting to wear your shoes without socks. I’m not talking about sandals or sneakers. I’m talking about “shoes” like the Church’s Grafton.

I tried it on Saturday, and didn’t get very far. For me relief came in a small box of Band Aid Brand, Blister Block strips.

Sure powder helps absorb perspiration but in this heat, not very much. What’s your secret to wearing shoes barefoot comfortably?


This entry was posted in Lifestyle and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

26 Comments

  1. Posted 9 June 2008 at 8:23 pm | Permalink

    Though it’s not barefoot, I’m a huge fan of terrycloth socks.

    Not so much with shorts…

    (Came by the shop for the first time this weekend, loved it!)

  2. Posted 9 June 2008 at 8:40 pm | Permalink

    Glad I stopped by last Sat too. Gorgeous and serene place you got there. Definitely my favorite corner in my neighborhood :)

  3. Posted 9 June 2008 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

    I gotta stop by the shop. I think i’m the only fan of the store that lives above 96th street. Umm…I try my best not to wear shoes without socks. I have sensitive feet and they get cut easy. Loafers are a different store. Are you guys going to be carrying any John Lobb’s?

  4. pweinste
    Posted 9 June 2008 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    not wearing socks with your shoes is ultimately un-hygenic.

  5. Chris Rimby
    Posted 9 June 2008 at 10:15 pm | Permalink

    I use Johnston and Murphy no-show socks. They work great.

  6. Posted 10 June 2008 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    use a non grease lotion to avoid sweating. Works great and leave shoes dry :-)

  7. Jamie
    Posted 11 June 2008 at 6:29 am | Permalink

    I would generally wear socks with any kind of lace-up shoe, with the excpetion of a moccasin or boat shoe. I stick to soft-calf, or well-worn loafers.

    After a few seasons of wear, the G&G Antibes with a pair of linen pants might do the trick.

  8. Jamie
    Posted 11 June 2008 at 6:30 am | Permalink

    Edit – forgot the word “not”

    I would generally NOT wear socks with any kind of lace-up shoe, with the excpetion of a moccasin or boat shoe. I stick to soft-calf, or well-worn loafers.

    After a few seasons of wear, the G&G Antibes with a pair of linen pants might do the trick.

  9. Posted 2 July 2008 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    A few days ago I happened across a mention on the GQ website of ‘loafer socks’ by Banana Republic that are meant for affecting a sockless look whilst wearing proper shoes, I picked up some over the weekend and they do the trick.

  10. TE
    Posted 3 July 2008 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    The no show socks never seem to protect my heels. This is the one area that gets ripped up with shoes and no socks. I’ve tried putting on a bandaid but that just rubs off my skin after walking a little bit

  11. Joe Frances
    Posted 10 July 2008 at 6:23 pm | Permalink

    Steve:

    Are your Church’s shoes from the Royal line that has been much talked about lately on AskAndy website?

  12. Steven
    Posted 10 July 2008 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    Joe,

    These Church’s are from the classic collection. The Royal line is available to us. If you are interested in them please let me know.

  13. Joe Frances
    Posted 17 July 2008 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    Steve,

    Thanks your reply. What’s the difference between the Classic collection and the Royal from Church’s?

    The Royal is getting a lot of play on the web.

  14. Christopher
    Posted 21 July 2010 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    No-sho socks and a bit suffering for fashion. ;)

  15. Posted 21 July 2010 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    H&M of all places has excellent no-show socks in black or white that are better than Banana Republic’s and cost half as much. They seem to sit just below the top of the shoe on my heel, and I haven’t had any unfortunate rubbing problems. Best of all, they come in two sizes! So they won’t bunch up if your feet are on the small side and won’t slip under your heel if you have bigger feet. They are the best thing I have found all summer. I couldn’t recommend them more highly.
    That is all.

  16. David Koa
    Posted 22 July 2010 at 10:27 am | Permalink

    Steven,

    I believe the previous posts covered this but the Banana Republic loafer socks are the way to go. Have tried other brands but they are the best, although more expensive. I wear the Shannon from Church’s with the loafer socks during summer nights.

  17. steven
    Posted 22 July 2010 at 11:32 am | Permalink

    Great advice and lots of options. Thanks guys.

  18. Tom Read
    Posted 22 July 2010 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    I’ve been wearing Falke’s ‘Invisible Socks’ for this look, pretty sure they were recommended in GQ / Esquire and on Mr.Hare’s shoe blog. Don’t know where you can get them in the states but I’d imagine they’d be pretty easy to get hold of. They’re better quality than your average no-show sock and have gel strips in the heel which help with grip and solve the blister issue (esp. if you plan on going for the barefoot look with more rigid leathers such as the binder-finish on the ‘Grafton’) healthier for your shoes than going totally barefoot too. They’re about £7 over here.
    Nice choice with the Sandalwood Grafton’s by the way!

  19. Jacob
    Posted 22 July 2010 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Is there a name for this style of shoe (wingtip with a sort of longwing type perf going towards the rear of the shoe)? I have a pair of Aldens that are exactly this style and I thought they were an anomaly until I saw this pair.

  20. Posted 22 July 2010 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    Not aware of a specific name for these other than full brogue, or possibly short wing.

  21. Otis
    Posted 23 July 2010 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

    SmartWool makes a “loafer” sock for men that is a very fine merino wool. It sits quite low, so it doesn’t show w/ most shoes. I love them, though they can slip a little (though not so much that I’ve had any blistering issues). the wool is not too hot–in fact they are incredibly comfortable even it pretty high temps (though I’ve not worn them in full on NYC summer swelter….)

  22. Michael
    Posted 24 July 2010 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    I find, as long as the shoes are well broken in, wearing them without socks isn’t a problem. I have a pair of almost all the loafer socks mentioned here but a lot of them still show with some shoes.

  23. Gerry
    Posted 31 July 2010 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    I understood that leather shoes with a leather lining would naturally wick away perspiration.

    I’ve gone bareback with quoddy, visvim and trickers and excuse the detail, the shoes and my feet smell of leather at the end of even the hottest day.

    But then i’m english, and while you Americans sweat and Frenchmen perspire, we simply glow!

  24. John Coverdale
    Posted 31 July 2010 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

    Gold Toe Loafer Sock. Three pair for $13.50

  25. fritzl
    Posted 8 August 2010 at 5:32 am | Permalink

    a good fit is all you need for going sockless.

  26. chris
    Posted 10 August 2010 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    hey steven…any chance you could post/send me some pics that include a variety of pants/denim that you wear with these pair? Also, i’d love to get more info on the upcoming wolverine 1000 mile boots that u are planning to get this fall. thanks!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Follow Us

  • Recent Tweets


  • Brands